Research in applied cardiopulmonary physiology and extracorporeal support

How the right heart copes with venous return – was Frank Starling wrong all along?

We have recently published a paper exploring thermodilution methods during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) ​1​. (Watch Video here). Traditionally, thermodilution methods have been the gold standard for cardiac output measurement. During the setting of VA ECMO, indicator or injectate gets sucked into the ECMO limb and gets passed into the pulmonary artery; therefore, traditional mathematical formulas fail to work.

We have developed an adaptation of traditional thermodilution methods by measuring the division of injectate into the ECMO circuit and the pulmonary artery. This then allows us to calculate native cardiac output during ECMO.

In this experiment, we have used the decay of the thermodilution signal to assess right heart function under different VA-ECMO flow settings. We were able to show, that the end-diastolic volume (EDV) shares an almost linear relationship with the end-systolic volume (ESV). This in turn means, that the right ventricle dilates in order to cope with the increasesd preload caused by increases in venous return to the right heart.

This is in contrast to classical Frank Starling teaching, where an increase in preload will lead to an increase in contractility. Was Frank Starling wrong?

The history of the right ventricle

The question is, whether the right ventricle behaves in a “Starling way” or whether its preload/performance relationship differs from the left ventricle.  Patterson and Starling​2​ produced their curves by measuring right atrial pressure and left ventricular output. In subsequent years, ventricular functions were investigated separately for each ventricle. In a landmark study on ventricular mechanics with right and left ventricular function curves in the fifties, Sarnoff already observed linear relations between right atrial pressure and stroke work ​3​.

Stroke Work shares a linear relationship with RA auricle mean pressure, while in the left ventricle there is a classic Frank-Starling curve ​3​.

Later, Tyberg showed that under volume expansion, right atrial (i. e. CVP) and pericardial pressure rose by the same extent, meaning that the transmural right atrial pressure (i.e. the true filling pressure) remained constant ​4​. Recent studies by Lansdorp​5​ and our group​6​ confirm these findings in different settings.

Figure showing the relationship between EDV and ESV during increases of PEEP (0, 5, 10, 15 cmH2O) ​7​.

Pinsky et al​8​ estimated RV volumes by the ejection fraction technique of the thermodilution profile as we used here. They could not find a consistent relationship between end-diastolic and stroke volumes, but a highly linear relationship between end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes. The corollary of these findings is that the right ventricle works below its stressed volume, summarized by Pinksy: “The determinants of RV function are uniquely different from those determining LV function even though both ventricles have anatomically and functionally similar cardiac myocytes and the same beat frequency. First, RV filling occurs without any measurable change in RV distending pressure. Thus, preload is independent of RV EDV unless the RV is hypertrophied. At which point, central venous pressure increases in proportion to the increase in RV EDV. Since venous return is the primary determinant of steady state cardiac output and since central venous pressure is the backpressure to venous return acute RV overload must be associated with both increases in central venous pressure and cardiovascular compromise (acute cor pulmonale).”​7​ The findings in our study for adapated thermodilution during VA ECMO are consistent with right ventricular physiology, when it is assessed independently of the left ventricle.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    Bachmann KF, Zwicker L, Nettelbeck K, et al. Assessment of Right Heart Function during Extracorporeal Therapy by Modified Thermodilution in a Porcine Model. Anesthesiology. Published online July 8, 2020. doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000003443
  2. 2.
    Patterson SW, Starling EH. On the mechanical factors which determine the output of the ventricles. The Journal of Physiology. Published online September 8, 1914:357-379. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1914.sp001669
  3. 3.
    SARNOFF SJ, BERGLUND E. Ventricular Function. Circulation. Published online May 1954:706-718. doi:10.1161/01.cir.9.5.706
  4. 4.
    Tyberg JV, Taichman GC, Smith ER, Douglas NW, Smiseth OA, Keon WJ. The relationship between pericardial pressure and right atrial pressure: an intraoperative study. Circulation. Published online March 1986:428-432. doi:10.1161/01.cir.73.3.428
  5. 5.
    Lansdorp B, Hofhuizen C, van Lavieren M, et al. Mechanical Ventilation–Induced Intrathoracic Pressure Distribution and Heart-Lung Interactions*. Critical Care Medicine. Published online September 2014:1983-1990. doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000000345
  6. 6.
    Berger D, Moller PW, Weber A, et al. Effect of PEEP, blood volume, and inspiratory hold maneuvers on venous return. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. Published online September 1, 2016:H794-H806. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00931.2015
  7. 7.
    Pinsky MR. My paper 20 years later: Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on right ventricular function in humans. Intensive Care Med. Published online April 24, 2014:935-941. doi:10.1007/s00134-014-3294-8
  8. 8.
    Pinsky MR, Desmet J-M, Vincent JL. Effect of Positive End-expiratory Pressure on Right Ventricular Function in Humans. Am Rev Respir Dis. Published online September 1992:681-687. doi:10.1164/ajrccm/146.3.681

Photo by Alexandru Acea on Unsplash

Cite this article

PhysiologyResearch.com (2. October 2022) How the right heart copes with venous return – was Frank Starling wrong all along?. Retrieved from https://physiologyresearch.com/2020/09/10/how-the-right-heart-copes-with-venous-return-was-frank-starling-wrong-all-along/.
"How the right heart copes with venous return – was Frank Starling wrong all along?." PhysiologyResearch.com - 2. October 2022, https://physiologyresearch.com/2020/09/10/how-the-right-heart-copes-with-venous-return-was-frank-starling-wrong-all-along/
PhysiologyResearch.com 10. September 2020 How the right heart copes with venous return – was Frank Starling wrong all along?., viewed 2. October 2022,<https://physiologyresearch.com/2020/09/10/how-the-right-heart-copes-with-venous-return-was-frank-starling-wrong-all-along/>
PhysiologyResearch.com - How the right heart copes with venous return – was Frank Starling wrong all along?. [Internet]. [Accessed 2. October 2022]. Available from: https://physiologyresearch.com/2020/09/10/how-the-right-heart-copes-with-venous-return-was-frank-starling-wrong-all-along/
"How the right heart copes with venous return – was Frank Starling wrong all along?." PhysiologyResearch.com - Accessed 2. October 2022. https://physiologyresearch.com/2020/09/10/how-the-right-heart-copes-with-venous-return-was-frank-starling-wrong-all-along/
"How the right heart copes with venous return – was Frank Starling wrong all along?." PhysiologyResearch.com [Online]. Available: https://physiologyresearch.com/2020/09/10/how-the-right-heart-copes-with-venous-return-was-frank-starling-wrong-all-along/. [Accessed: 2. October 2022]

No Comment Yet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.